KANKRI VANTAS ♋ (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
privilegecheck) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
paradisa2013-03-18 08:04 pm
privilegecheck) wrote in paradisa2013-03-18 08:04 pm
Entry tags:
TW: First Post
[ Apparently, Kankri found a red pen...somewhere. Oh boy. ]
This 699k is f9r messages, yes? In that case, I simply have t9 say that wh9ever y9u are, we are getting 9ff t9 a very 6ad start with the n9nc9nsensual kidnapping 6usiness. This d9es n9t 69de well f9r any relati9nship y9u are h9ping t9 esta6lish. Taking my sweater isn't particularly g99d 9f y9u either. It's m9re ann9ying than really triggering, 6ut it has sentimental value t9 me, and I'd appreciate it if y9u c9uld return it t9 me and refrain fr9m handling my pers9n with9ut my c9nsent in the future. In fact, we're g9ing t9 have t9 esta6lish s9me str9ng 69undaries c9ncerning pers9nal space, I feel.
Furtherm9re, while I'm sure y9ur heart (9r vascular 9rgan anal9gue, I d9n't mean t9 exclude the differently anat9mied fr9m this discussi9n) was in the right place, n9nc9nsensually rec9rp9realizing s9me9ne int9 a palace fit f9r r9yalty is highly pr96lematic. N9t 9nly d9es it imply the excesses ass9ciated with class divisi9n, a deeply distur6ing t9pic in itself, 6ut that kind 9f thing c9uld 6e highly triggering t9 s9me9ne wh9 w9uld prefer t9 remain dead. I'm sure y9u were 9nly acting in the interests 9f what y9u felt 6est, 6ut it's all rather patr9nizing. In the future I'd appreciate it if y9u c9uld ask my 9pini9n 6ef9re d9ing anything p9tentially triggering with my 69dy 9r state 9f m9rtality.
I'm glad we talked this 9ut. Please let me kn9w if y9u f9und anything c9nfusing 9r triggering, I realize these new c9ncepts may 6e a l9t t9 take in f9r s9me9ne unaware 9f their m9rtality 9r caste privilege.
This 699k is f9r messages, yes? In that case, I simply have t9 say that wh9ever y9u are, we are getting 9ff t9 a very 6ad start with the n9nc9nsensual kidnapping 6usiness. This d9es n9t 69de well f9r any relati9nship y9u are h9ping t9 esta6lish. Taking my sweater isn't particularly g99d 9f y9u either. It's m9re ann9ying than really triggering, 6ut it has sentimental value t9 me, and I'd appreciate it if y9u c9uld return it t9 me and refrain fr9m handling my pers9n with9ut my c9nsent in the future. In fact, we're g9ing t9 have t9 esta6lish s9me str9ng 69undaries c9ncerning pers9nal space, I feel.
Furtherm9re, while I'm sure y9ur heart (9r vascular 9rgan anal9gue, I d9n't mean t9 exclude the differently anat9mied fr9m this discussi9n) was in the right place, n9nc9nsensually rec9rp9realizing s9me9ne int9 a palace fit f9r r9yalty is highly pr96lematic. N9t 9nly d9es it imply the excesses ass9ciated with class divisi9n, a deeply distur6ing t9pic in itself, 6ut that kind 9f thing c9uld 6e highly triggering t9 s9me9ne wh9 w9uld prefer t9 remain dead. I'm sure y9u were 9nly acting in the interests 9f what y9u felt 6est, 6ut it's all rather patr9nizing. In the future I'd appreciate it if y9u c9uld ask my 9pini9n 6ef9re d9ing anything p9tentially triggering with my 69dy 9r state 9f m9rtality.
I'm glad we talked this 9ut. Please let me kn9w if y9u f9und anything c9nfusing 9r triggering, I realize these new c9ncepts may 6e a l9t t9 take in f9r s9me9ne unaware 9f their m9rtality 9r caste privilege.
no subject
diidnt read
no subject
Unless y9u aren't a tr9ll? My ap9l9gies, that was very 6ef9ran-centric 9f me.