Entry tags:
THE LEWIS AND CLARK
[You have woken up aboard the Lewis and Clark. It's a nice, clean, light vessel and everything seems to be in working order...at the moment. Explore!]
[[OOC: AROUND THE SHIP | THE CONTROL ROOM | THE DOORS | STASIS | DAY ONE OOC POST | PLOT CHAT | PLOT HUB]]
[[OOC: AROUND THE SHIP | THE CONTROL ROOM | THE DOORS | STASIS | DAY ONE OOC POST | PLOT CHAT | PLOT HUB]]
no subject
[He strokes his chin as he thinks.]
And why would you create black holes in the first place? How would you escape their pull?
no subject
As for how the ship isn't destroyed, that's contained by the core. Shaw-Fujikawa drives, we call them. Most expensive piece of equipment known to man.
no subject
But there isn't any negative effect for doing something like that? You'd think everything that could possibly go wrong would.
no subject
[He crosses his arms as he looks at the schematics.]
Of course, we use a bunch of tiny black holes and not one big one. But if I remember right, the TARDIS has a black hole in it, too. Maybe the Doctor knows?
/sidles on in here, y/n?
You're correct, York. Albeit, the Eye of Harmony in the TARDIS is usually linked to the one on Gallifrey. Containment is key.
[He's going to slip right in there and start pressing buttons. Whaaat? It's a control room, buttons are meant to be flipped and pressed.]
If you could harness the power of a star at perpetual collapse the power provided would be endless. To do that, you need an anchor; a containment field strong enough. To answer your first question, [he looks at the gentleman York is talking with, ] very carefully.
y :)
Yeah. The ones we make in a Slipspace drive aren't stable, so they only last a few microseconds - just enough to make the jump. I don't know what kind of technology this one has, but--if we're only in 2047, well, it's not the same technology as I know.